<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Use The Wrong Lens</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2008/04/use-the-wrong-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2008/04/use-the-wrong-lens/</link> <description>The Blog of Photographer David duChemin // Gear is Good. Vision is Better.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2008/04/use-the-wrong-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-983</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:27:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=384#comment-983</guid> <description>David - I certainly appreciate the comments and today experienced the exact same frustration.  And adding to my lens indecision was a 30mph wind that prevented anything sharp in the tulip fields I was shooting.  I did get some decent blurry &quot;seas of color&quot; from the wind blown event.  In particular I appreciate your comments about appreciating the shots we get rather than perseverating on the shots we missed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; I certainly appreciate the comments and today experienced the exact same frustration.  And adding to my lens indecision was a 30mph wind that prevented anything sharp in the tulip fields I was shooting.  I did get some decent blurry &#8220;seas of color&#8221; from the wind blown event.  In particular I appreciate your comments about appreciating the shots we get rather than perseverating on the shots we missed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2008/04/use-the-wrong-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:27:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=384#comment-982</guid> <description>David - I certainly appreciate the comments and today experienced the exact same frustration.  And adding to my lens indecision was a 30mph wind that prevented anything sharp in the tulip fields I was shooting.  I did get some decent blurry &quot;seas of color&quot; from the wind blown event. In particular I appreciate your comments about appreciating the shots we get rather than perseverating on the shots we missed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; I certainly appreciate the comments and today experienced the exact same frustration.  And adding to my lens indecision was a 30mph wind that prevented anything sharp in the tulip fields I was shooting.  I did get some decent blurry &#8220;seas of color&#8221; from the wind blown event.<br /> In particular I appreciate your comments about appreciating the shots we get rather than perseverating on the shots we missed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2008/04/use-the-wrong-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 04:14:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=384#comment-972</guid> <description>i have the 85mm 1.8 and i love the sharpness of the photos i get with it. If I do move up to an L lens, I&#039;d probably get the 135mm f2 and not the 85mm 1.2L. Again, that&#039;s also based on the reviews and a conversation with a fellow photographer that I had who used that lens too. Plus, it&#039;s also way out of my budget.David - I agree with your sub-thoughts. I have been using 85mm f1.8 and 17-40 f4 and I&#039;m perfectly happy with my shots. I tried the 24-105 before but it took me some time to get used to it. I couldn&#039;t figure out which focal length to use it. Maybe I just have to be more familiar with it. I guess the lesser the number of choices, the better, because you will be forced to just make the most of what you have.My next lens though, I&#039;m still thinking if it&#039;s the 135f2, 24-70 f2.8 or the 70-200 f2.8! What do you suggest?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have the 85mm 1.8 and i love the sharpness of the photos i get with it. If I do move up to an L lens, I&#8217;d probably get the 135mm f2 and not the 85mm 1.2L. Again, that&#8217;s also based on the reviews and a conversation with a fellow photographer that I had who used that lens too. Plus, it&#8217;s also way out of my budget.</p><p>David &#8211; I agree with your sub-thoughts. I have been using 85mm f1.8 and 17-40 f4 and I&#8217;m perfectly happy with my shots. I tried the 24-105 before but it took me some time to get used to it. I couldn&#8217;t figure out which focal length to use it. Maybe I just have to be more familiar with it. I guess the lesser the number of choices, the better, because you will be forced to just make the most of what you have.</p><p>My next lens though, I&#8217;m still thinking if it&#8217;s the 135f2, 24-70 f2.8 or the 70-200 f2.8! What do you suggest?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: david</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2008/04/use-the-wrong-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link> <dc:creator>david</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:19:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=384#comment-968</guid> <description>You let me know if you decide to sell the 85/1.2, Gary. I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll decide the same thing as you, but I prefer to learn my lessons the hard way and I think my WV work would be a good fit for this lens. On the other hand, maybe it&#039;s just so tempting because of all that glass.I would love a tilt-shift lens to play with - have often thought a portrait series with a perspective lens would be really cool. Lucky guy. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You let me know if you decide to sell the 85/1.2, Gary. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll decide the same thing as you, but I prefer to learn my lessons the hard way and I think my WV work would be a good fit for this lens. On the other hand, maybe it&#8217;s just so tempting because of all that glass.</p><p>I would love a tilt-shift lens to play with &#8211; have often thought a portrait series with a perspective lens would be really cool. Lucky guy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gary S. Chapman</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2008/04/use-the-wrong-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-967</link> <dc:creator>gary S. Chapman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:02:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=384#comment-967</guid> <description>Funny you should have an 85mm 1.2 as the photo for the lead of this &quot;Wrong Lens&quot; post. This lens is such a great piece of glass. But, it is so heavy and slow that I have only taken it overseas once. I bought an 85mm 1.8 to replace it and I&#039;m just about as happy. I may even sell the 1.2! On my trips I try to take my standard lenses to cover 24-200mm, 1-2 fast lenses and a wild-card lens like a tilt-shift or super-wide to make me think creatively. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should have an 85mm 1.2 as the photo for the lead of this &#8220;Wrong Lens&#8221; post. This lens is such a great piece of glass. But, it is so heavy and slow that I have only taken it overseas once. I bought an 85mm 1.8 to replace it and I&#8217;m just about as happy. I may even sell the 1.2! On my trips I try to take my standard lenses to cover 24-200mm, 1-2 fast lenses and a wild-card lens like a tilt-shift or super-wide to make me think creatively.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk
Object Caching 268/272 objects using disk

Served from: www.pixelatedimage.com @ 2012-02-11 07:05:36 -->
