Getting Organized with Colour Labels
November 3rd, 2008![]()
With my Lightroom catalogs getting fatter and fatter and my images beginning to serve several different markets, I finally got around to making use of the colour labels in a way that is more than totally ad-hoc and half-assed.
My usual routine is to use the colours simply in place of collections – it’s a lazy way of indicating which images I’m selecting for a stock submission or a competition. And after doing it for way to long I have collections full of colour-coded images that indicate, well, that’s the problem. I haven’t a clue what they indicate.
So last week, in the middle of a huge stock submission, I finally caved-in and implemented the system. I changed the colour-coding in my catalogs to meaningful designations. Now at a moment’s notice I can tell if an image is one I’ve reserved for personal use or is licensed to a client. I can tell which ones are stock submissions, and which ones are tweaked and ready to go.
I’m an unusually organized person, but this particular area of chaos in my life has been a bit of a skeleton in my closet. How do you manage your organization? Do you have a system? What’s going to happen 5 years when your library hits 100,000 and you can’t remember which images you submitted to stock or sold to a client?
Two Things You Should Know
When I made this change I lost my colour labels on all my other images. Lightroom set them all to white and I needed to go through and change them all – about 100,000 images. It was short work as I usually shoot in batches, so I could re-code whole collections, but I would have been really choked if I’d lost important coding. I think I just missed something, so I suggest you dig out your copy of Kelby’s Lightroom 2 Book for Digital Photographers and follow his instructions – page 121-122
But if you don’t have that book, and you should, then you can find the re-name dialogue by going to the Metadata menu choosing Color Label Set, and choosing Edit. Once you’ve assigned designations to colours, name the set something more meaningful than what I’ve done (Default (edited) – not very descriptive, eh?). Finally go back to Metadata > Color Label Set – and select the set you just created, telling Lightroom which set to use.
Presumably you can create different sets and select them based on needs. You might have one label set for Usage, one for Post-Processing, and one for, well something else. I haven’t played with switching back and forth and that may be why I lost my original colour-coding. It was probably as easy as going back, selecting the un-edited default set, and going from there.
The colour-coding I’ve done to this point revolves around the need to delineate between Stock, Personal, and Client files. The green one isn’t going to be useful. Why? The moment I change a red client file to a green “ready to go” file, I lose the red label and I lose the advantage of the whole system. At some point, when I’m feeling brave enough, I might try creating a whole additional set of labels. If anyone out there is using multiple label sets for multiple uses, let us know how it’s going.
Stay organized, stay sane.


David,
First time poster, long time lurker.
I think this is one of the great secrets of both Photoshop (from CS2 forward) and Lightroom. I work with a newspaper, two agencies and send images to PhotoShelter. Easily keeping track of what’s going where was a nightmare. Back in CS2 days I started using labels for that and it’s been great. Before Lightroom I could open a folder in Bridge and tell at a glance what pics were where. With LR it’s even easier. I have labels for both the agencies, my newspaper, Photoshelter and a “pending” label. Pending are pics I like but which I haven’t quite figured out what to do with yet. I wish there were more labels available to us.
thanks,
jack
Does anyone have any similar suggestions for us Aperture 2.1 users?
Yeah, switch to Lightroom. AHAHAHAHA. Ahem. Sorry. Couldn’t resist.
This is yet another reason I prefer Lightroom to Aperture. Aperture is way sexier looking, but Lightroom gets it done.
I know colour labels are not possible but a quick google search turned this up:
http://blogs.oreilly.com/aperture/2008/03/labels-without-keywords.html
I don’t always have the time to sit down and plow through my entire workflow in one sitting with my pictures, so I use the color labels a little different.
Red- Needs Tagged
Yellow- Needs Developed
Green – Edit in Photoshop/Creative Editing
I haven’t found a reason to use the other 2 colors yet, but the possibility is there, like if I wanted to split my Creative Edits (which I mean tinkering with lightroom settings or presets) into one color, and my Edit in Photoshop into another.
Also, Smart Collections is another powerful organization tool with Lightroom 2–it’s as simple as adding a tag to your image, and it will automatically create the collection for you (so instead of color labeling, just create a tag for “Client,” “Personal,” etc. and the smart collection will automatically organize it for you
Another reason I prefer Lightroom over Aperture is that LR reads .xmp files. So if you’ve created your archive in Bridge and Photoshop, LR reads the .xmp sidecar files (including labels you may have used in Bridge). Aperture doesn’t. The only caveat is that you have to set up your LR and Bridge labels with the same name on each.
jack
you should give that preset an appropriate name.