<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Global Workflow</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/</link> <description>The Blog of Photographer David duChemin // Gear is Good. Vision is Better.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator> <item><title>By: Picturing Change &#183; How to Start Out as a Humanitarian Photographer: The Self-Assignment</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-28101</link> <dc:creator>Picturing Change &#183; How to Start Out as a Humanitarian Photographer: The Self-Assignment</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 20:12:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-28101</guid> <description>[...] be no catching up. I recommend using David duChemin&#8217;s global workflow as a starting point (alternate link here). Always have your camera with you, even if you think you are just being taken to the bakery for [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be no catching up. I recommend using David duChemin&#8217;s global workflow as a starting point (alternate link here). Always have your camera with you, even if you think you are just being taken to the bakery for [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A stunning festival of photography links… &#8211; Chuqui 3.0</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-16317</link> <dc:creator>A stunning festival of photography links… &#8211; Chuqui 3.0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 06:41:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-16317</guid> <description>[...] duChemin: Global Workflow (from Photoshop [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] duChemin: Global Workflow (from Photoshop [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: How to Start Out as a Humanitarian Photographer: The Self-Assignment &#171; Picturing Change</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-11987</link> <dc:creator>How to Start Out as a Humanitarian Photographer: The Self-Assignment &#171; Picturing Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:47:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-11987</guid> <description>[...] be no catching up.  I recommend using David duChemin&#8217;s global workflow as a starting point (alternate link here).  Always have your camera with you, even if you think you are just being taken to the bakery for [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be no catching up.  I recommend using David duChemin&#8217;s global workflow as a starting point (alternate link here).  Always have your camera with you, even if you think you are just being taken to the bakery for [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sean Phillips</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-5247</link> <dc:creator>Sean Phillips</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:55:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-5247</guid> <description>Yes, I definitely delete my rejects and once they are deleted they are gone forever.  My summary workflow is:1. import all files with 1:1 previews 2. first pass rough edit deleting all blurry, out of focus, and otherwise obvious bad images (including duplicates that really are identical , but I do keep images that are only similar if they are technically good) 3. 2nd pass edit with detailed assessment of duplicates and marginal images to see if they can be saved and/or if they are worth keeping 4. my nightly backup will copy all the keepers into my extensive backup system (eventually there will at least 4 copies of everything) 5. on future days any additional edits or deletions will also propogate through that backup systemIt works for me, but I would like to be able to have at least 2 copies before doing any edits.  I haven&#039;t been able to find an automated way to do that so far as any software that I have tried will get confused when there are copies of images on the backup drive that aren&#039;t on the main drive.  I&#039;m sure I could get around it (maybe with something more like time machine).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I definitely delete my rejects and once they are deleted they are gone forever.  My summary workflow is:</p><p>1. import all files with 1:1 previews<br /> 2. first pass rough edit deleting all blurry, out of focus, and otherwise obvious bad images (including duplicates that really are identical , but I do keep images that are only similar if they are technically good)<br /> 3. 2nd pass edit with detailed assessment of duplicates and marginal images to see if they can be saved and/or if they are worth keeping<br /> 4. my nightly backup will copy all the keepers into my extensive backup system (eventually there will at least 4 copies of everything)<br /> 5. on future days any additional edits or deletions will also propogate through that backup system</p><p>It works for me, but I would like to be able to have at least 2 copies before doing any edits.  I haven&#8217;t been able to find an automated way to do that so far as any software that I have tried will get confused when there are copies of images on the backup drive that aren&#8217;t on the main drive.  I&#8217;m sure I could get around it (maybe with something more like time machine).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-5246</link> <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:54:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-5246</guid> <description>Thanks Sean, I waited until I received my issue to read the article and then looked up this post to ask that very question.I was also curious if you were deleting the rejects from your working library but still maintained a backup of the entire shoot - just in case you were ever to revisit what you once thought was bad.In summary. Reject photos are deleted forever.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sean, I waited until I received my issue to read the article and then looked up this post to ask that very question.</p><p>I was also curious if you were deleting the rejects from your working library but still maintained a backup of the entire shoot &#8211; just in case you were ever to revisit what you once thought was bad.</p><p>In summary. Reject photos are deleted forever.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Big Q: Organization in LR2 &#124; PixelatedImage Blog</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-4986</link> <dc:creator>The Big Q: Organization in LR2 &#124; PixelatedImage Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:00:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-4986</guid> <description>[...] Global Workflow [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Global Workflow [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-4960</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:03:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-4960</guid> <description>Sean - Great Q. I backup my stuff like crazy on the road, but so long as nothing goes south or gets stolen, when I get home I simply export the files as catalog from the laptop, so my deleted stuff doesn&#039;t go over to main drives when I get home. Does this make sense. I know what you&#039;re asking, just not sure if I&#039;m answering it right.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean &#8211; Great Q. I backup my stuff like crazy on the road, but so long as nothing goes south or gets stolen, when I get home I simply export the files as catalog from the laptop, so my deleted stuff doesn&#8217;t go over to main drives when I get home. Does this make sense. I know what you&#8217;re asking, just not sure if I&#8217;m answering it right.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sean Phillips</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-4959</link> <dc:creator>Sean Phillips</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:50:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-4959</guid> <description>Thanks for a great article!So you make two (or three) copies of all of the files before doing any editing, then you delete all the obviously bad ones.  Do you then go back in and sync all the deletes on the backup drives??I&#039;ve heard of many photogs using the automatic backup on import to Lightroom, but I&#039;ve never been able to figure out how to easily sync the deletes.  I generally make my backup copies only after my first edit.  I like to shoot lots of images, and so there are usually lots to delete right away as well.  How do you make this work?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a great article!</p><p>So you make two (or three) copies of all of the files before doing any editing, then you delete all the obviously bad ones.  Do you then go back in and sync all the deletes on the backup drives??</p><p>I&#8217;ve heard of many photogs using the automatic backup on import to Lightroom, but I&#8217;ve never been able to figure out how to easily sync the deletes.  I generally make my backup copies only after my first edit.  I like to shoot lots of images, and so there are usually lots to delete right away as well.  How do you make this work?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aleksei Saunders</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-4957</link> <dc:creator>Aleksei Saunders</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:03:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-4957</guid> <description>Gotcha - Thanks.Now, do you have a workflow for 6,425 concert photos?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotcha &#8211; Thanks.</p><p>Now, do you have a workflow for 6,425 concert photos?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2009/04/global-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-4956</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:31:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/?p=2622#comment-4956</guid> <description>Atta boy, Alex!Pogo only prints from JPG or RAW+JPG, but it needs the JPG. I just set my C1 custom function to JPG, P-mode, quick an&#039;dirty shot so I don&#039;t have to fiddle with it all.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atta boy, Alex!</p><p>Pogo only prints from JPG or RAW+JPG, but it needs the JPG. I just set my C1 custom function to JPG, P-mode, quick an&#8217;dirty shot so I don&#8217;t have to fiddle with it all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk
Object Caching 369/372 objects using disk

Served from: www.pixelatedimage.com @ 2012-02-11 06:27:29 -->
