
I was going to end this week off with a list of photography bloggers who are dishing it up consistently well, but I’d like to give y’all a little more time to weigh in on that. So I’ll post that next week. In the mean time, something a little more along the lines of brainfood.
Sometimes I find myself saying things and before they’re out of my mouth I realize it’s too late and I come off sounding like one of two people: Grandpa Simpson or Mary Poppins. The other day I put a comment on Twitter to the effect that great photography happens at the junction of vision and craft, to which my smart-alec wife replied: “I think “the junction of craft and vision” sounds a bit hokey. Is that where Engineer Discipline hooks the Engine of Hard Work up to the Train of Possibility?” Yeesh, have I become a total cornball?
And then just this morning I started writing this article and started with, and erased, a rant about Program Mode and the way camera companies seem more and more to be playing the “this camera’s so good, now there’s no reason not to shoot like the pros” card. Suddenly I realized that the next step for me was complaining about this newfangled VCR technology and yelling at kids to get off my lawn.
But. I still have a beef. If my friend Ron Carroll chimes in here a couple times a month it’s often as the elder statesman reminding me to be gracious and positive. So with his voice in my head, let me re-word my rant into something more, uh, uplifting-ish. Ok, that’s a stretch, how about less rant-ish? Ok, here goes.
Nothing the camera companies will ever do to their cameras will make shooting “like a pro” (whatever that means) automatic. There will never be a “shoot like a pro” mode and I’m reminded of this every time I or someone else jokes that the P on the camera’s mode dial stands for Professional. While “being a pro” seems to imply that all professional photographers create photographs that transcend mediocrity – OH! How I wish this were true! – it just isn’t so. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, the designation of professional means you make money at this, nothing more. It does not mean your work is excellent, your vision has stopped evolving, or your craft is at its apex. It certainly doesn’t mean your work is better than other photographers who have chosen to do this avocationally. In fact, it could mean the opposite. Doing this professionally often means deeper ruts into which we fall.
I’m digressing (but I think the rant’s gaining momentum. Sorry, Ron. I tried. I am a weak man)
Somewhere along the road we lost sight of this simple, fundamental fact about photography – it’s an aesthetic craft. How much light hits the film plane/sensor plane is important for a decent exposure, but if that’s how we define a “good photograph” then dear Lord, take me now. Randomly choosing an aperture of f/8 because it lets in just the right amount of light isn’t photography. It’s math. Our cameras are really good at the math, but lousy on poetry. And that’s what photography is. I don’t want to steal his thunder, so I’ll skirt the analogy, but Vincent Versace wrote a beautiful, and profound, Afterword in my book, Within The Frame, and it’s had me thinking ever since. Sure even in poetry math has its uses to describe metre and rhyming structure, but it’s role is descriptive, not prescriptive. Poems are about passion. So is photography. And the minute I allow my camera’s math to determine the look of my image is the minute I concede that, in fact, photography is nothing more than framing things and letting the camera do the work for me. Every aperture setting, every shutter speed, has an effect on the aesthetic of the image and it should be you, not the camera, making those choices as they correspond to your vision.
To me this means shooting on what I call AV/EV Mode. I shoot in AV mode, consciously choosing the aperture because the first aesthetic choice I generally want to make in regards to exposure is the depth of field. Then I use the histogram to tell me if I’ve got something close to a good digital negative, and I use the EV compensation to bring the exposure closer to my ideal. Some of you will do this using TV mode. Some will use Manual, and even others will use Program and shift the aperture/shutter combination. For the image at the top of this post I shot on Manual mode to allow me the most control over my panning. However you do it, I encourage you to reconsider the role your camera’s mathematical brain has in contributing to the poetry of your images.
Thus endeth the rant.
Have a great weekend. When Monday rolls around it will be a mere 3 weeks until the book is released. You can almost hold your breath that long.